Monday, October 27, 2008

WHY ET DID NOT RETRIEVE AT ROSWELL by Anthony Bragalia

crash1947.jpg

Many who wonder about the Roswell crash wonder why ET did not retrieve its own craft and crew. How can we fathom that they left their own on the desert floor? This is a question that has an answer, though we have no obligation to provide one. This is because the Alien Intent can never be fully discerned with any certainty. But we can try.

There are seven possible scenarios- one of which may well have played out in July of 1947 over the skies of Chaves and Lincoln Counties:

1) Perhaps the craft that crashed did not have a "companion craft" or "mothership" in the nearby cosmos to be able to arrive in time to Earth to make a recovery. Man has never sent multiple spaceships at the same time to the same destination.

2) If such a ship were in the area, perhaps the retrieval of all the strewn debris, craft components and corpses would have too difficult to accomplish (and cover up) in time to remain undetected. ET did not wish to risk further exposure -or perhaps even confrontation- with Man. It took us many days and many people to retrieve everything. And still it was not done effectively. The retrieval was seen by those who should not have seen, with some of the material being taken by them.

3) Maybe ET did try a crash retrieval, but simply failed to locate the craft and arrive in time. The debris and bodies may have already been discovered by us by then. Sightings of UFOs in the region spiked in the days immediately following the crash. Was ET still looking for its fallen?

4) ET may well have had a concern about the safety of retrieval. Whatever caused the crash to occur in that area at that time (such as a missile or triangulated radar beams) could cause a retrieval craft to come in harm's way too. The risk assessed, they elected not to initiate a recovery operation.

5) Warring factions of visitors caused one to ram to the ground. The aerial battle engaged- priority and concern was for survival, not retrieval.

6) Just as it was the first time that we did not know immediately quite how to handle the situation, it was the first earthly crash that ET had experienced. They may well have had similar hesitancy or disagreement about dealing with the event. This delay may have prevented a timely retrieval.

7) ET did not want to retrieve. They may have in some way desired to "seed" or "plant" themselves and their technology with Man at that point in history. The crash would give Man concrete knowledge that he is not alone in the Universe. They may have hoped that this would curtail further development of nuclear armament, promoting peace and openness. ET can be wrong.

Man must assign cause or motive to the unexplained. It is our compulsion...for man learns nothing except by going from the known to the unknown. But why they came here, why they crashed and failed to retrieve- are things perhaps forever unknowable.

6 Comments:

Blogger Adrian said...

8)There was no ET craft-crash but merely a rash with an, for the time, exotic craft, engineered by the Germans previous to that period. The ET story was the most conveniant to lead away from the real origins of this craft

October 30, 2008  
Blogger RRRGroup said...

N.B. We think Adrian has a typo; he meant "crash" rather than "rash."

Max

October 30, 2008  
Blogger coolpolitealex said...

yes you make some intresting theories ,but one you may have missed out and that is that space travel and possibly the shift in the unknown to us and their time was up and they had to travel back and possibly their technology alllows for certain scenarios but doing other things elsewhere ,also damage could possibly made it difficult to contact

October 30, 2008  
Blogger BoyintheMachine said...

I've done similar blogs in the past with the theory that if Roswell was the crash of an extraterrestrial craft then it was done to 'raise' us.

Even Corso wrote in his book about being hesitant about reverse-engineering and letting this technology out for fear that it may be exactly what 'they' wanted.

Then again, I believe that UFOs and their occupants may be technologhy themselves, i.e. an advanced machine intelligence, or extraterrestrial/otherworldly artificial intelligence.

November 03, 2008  
Blogger T. Sena said...

Or, what if all the conspiracy 'stuff' is true and the craft was crashed on purpose as a sort of payment to the government, technologically speaking, in exchange for swiping humans whenever they feel like it.

Alien= "Okay, we give you a ship to reverse engineer, and you give us some humans to eat...um... I mean, to study."

Government Agent= "Ok."

No, but seriously, if something did crash at Roswell and was NOT retrieved by its kind, then perhaps it was done on purpose.

-T

November 03, 2008  
Blogger Michael said...

Interesting question, Anthony, and you present some credible scenarios. If there were also biological ET entities involved, then the event speaks to a ruthlessness or lack of concern for one of their own. I think they could have created a diversion, a fog bank, or other means of effecting a retrieval, if they so desired. There have been several reports suggesting that the "small greys" may be androids, which would perhaps make them expendable. It all points to a deliberate crash, or deliberate restraint from retrieving a craft shot down, in order to further their own long term agenda.

November 22, 2008  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home